Legal Opinion

State v. Rosenbaum

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided December 6, 1995No. 974-93Published

1Dissent 1

DISSENTING OPINION ON STATE’S MOTION FOB REHEARING ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

2Dissent · BairdBaird, Judge

On November 30,1994, we delivered a well reasoned opinion in this case in response to the State’s petition for discretionary review. At that time, four members of this Court dissented. On January 1, 1995, two judges left the Court and were replaced, by two newly elected judges. On March 29, 1995, the Court, with the newly elected judges participating, granted the State’s motion for rehearing. Today, the majority adopts the dissenting opinion and reverses our opinion on original submission.

I

The State…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. GaudinSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. State v. RosenbaumCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API