State v. Rosenbaum
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Dissent 1
DISSENTING OPINION ON STATE’S MOTION FOB REHEARING ON STATE’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
2Dissent · BairdBaird, Judge
On November 30,1994, we delivered a well reasoned opinion in this case in response to the State’s petition for discretionary review. At that time, four members of this Court dissented. On January 1, 1995, two judges left the Court and were replaced, by two newly elected judges. On March 29, 1995, the Court, with the newly elected judges participating, granted the State’s motion for rehearing. Today, the majority adopts the dissenting opinion and reverses our opinion on original submission.
I
The State…
3Cases cited2 opinions
- United States v. GaudinSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- State v. RosenbaumCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993