Legal Opinion

Ardela, Inc. v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided April 23, 1969No. Docket Nos. 5629-67, 5630-67, 5633-67, 5634-67UnpublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ardela, Inc., et al. v. Commissioner.1

Ardela, Inc. v. Commissioner

Docket Nos. 5629-67, 5630-67, 5633-67, 5634-67.

United States Tax Court

T.C. Memo 1969-83; 1969 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 213; 28 T.C.M. (CCH) 470; T.C.M. (RIA) 69083;

April 23, 1969, Filed

David A. Katz, 935 Nat'l Bank Bldg., Toledo, Ohio, for the petitioners. Harvey N. Shapiro, for the respondent.

TANNENWALD

Memorandum Findings of Fact and Opinion

TANNENWALD, Judge: Respondent determined deficiencies in petitioners' Federal income taxes as follows:

Dkt. No.

Taxable year ending

Deficiency

5629-67

October 31, 1960

$ 290.53

October 31, 1961

288.52

Octo…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Corn Products Refining Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. Booth Newspapers, Inc. v. The United States. The Evening News Association v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1962
  3. Steadman v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 1968
  4. McClain v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. Bullock v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1956

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. King v. Director, Division of TaxationNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2005
  2. Kessel v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API