City of Muskegon v. Lange
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Muskegon. (Palmer, J., presiding.) Assumpsit. Plaintiff brings error. The facts; are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.
The defendant was cashier of a national bank in the city of Muskegon. Taxes were assessed against, the several stockholders upon the stock of said bank, two-of whom failed to pay. Demand was then made upon the-defendant, who refused payment. The action is based upon section 33 of Act No. 195, Laws of 1889 (3 How. Stat. §• 1170(22), which provides:
“In case of any tax assessed upon the shares of the-capital stock of any bank, he [the treasurer] shall call upon the cashier of such bank, and demand payment thereof; and thereupon it shall be the duty of such cashier to pay the same, and charge the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Lionberger v. RouseSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- Eyke v. LangeMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
3Cited by5 opinions
- State ex rel. Bay v. Citizens State BankSupreme Court of Missouri · 1918
- Shainwald v. First National Bank of WeiserIdaho Supreme Court · 1910
- Wayne County & Home Sav. Bank v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1932
- Wayne County & Home Savings Bank v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1932
- Manufacturers National Bank v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1938