Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

King v. King

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 26, 1989No. 2153Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partTamilia, Judge

Appellant husband appeals an Order entered May 31, 1988 which approved and affirmed recommendations of a hearing officer and dismissed his exceptions to a proposed Order of support. The support Order directs him to pay support in the amount of $1,025 per month for support of appellee spouse and $1,935 per month for support of the parties’ four minor children. While the majority affirms the trial court on all aspects of the appeal, I would modify the support award and disallow as income the $373 appellant contributes to a pension plan. I also believe the trial court accorded too much emphasis…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Melzer v. WitsbergerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Sutliff v. SutliffSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Commonwealth ex rel. McQuiddy v. McQuiddySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Morley v. MorleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. Laughlin v. LaughlinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API