Legal Opinion
Rodman v. Grant Foundation
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 13, 1978No. 78 CIV. 1653(MP)PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
POLLACK, District Judge.
The defendants seek dismissal of this suit on the grounds that the plaintiff has failed to state or show grounds entitling him to relief and that the Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction. Rules 56(b), 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6), Fed.R.Civ.P. The plaintiff has proceeded in this Court on the notion that he is asserting violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, specifically sections 10(b) and 14(a) thereof, 15 U.S.C. §§ 78j(b), 78n(a), and Rules 10b-5 and 14a-9 thereunder, 17 C.F.R. §§ 240.10b-5, 14a-9.
This suit arises from seven purchases by the W. T. Grant…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Santa Fe Industries, Inc. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,959 Frank Lanza, Jr. v. Drexel & Co., Theodore J. Kircher and Christie F. VitoloCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
- Myzel v. FieldsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967
- Schoenbaum v. FirstbrookCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- Goldberg v. MeridorCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Rodman v. Grant FoundationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- Warner Communications, Inc. v. MurdochDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1984
- Polar International Brokerage Corp. v. ReeveDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Klamberg v. RothDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1979
- Lewis v. Oppenheimer & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1979
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.