Legal Opinion

Shoeman v. Temple Safety Deposit Vaults

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 13, 1914No. Gen. No. 19,605PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Joseph Sabath, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1913.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McSurely

Plaintiff rented a safety deposit box in the vaults of the defendant, Temple Safety Deposit Vaults, a corporation. He brought suit to recover damages for the alleged failure of defendants to keep safe certain property deposited in said box by plaintiff, namely a one thousand dollar bill. He had judgment, which defendants seek to have reversed.

The Temple Safety Deposit Vaults is a corporation engaged in renting safety deposit boxes, and plaintiff rented such a box. The relation between the parties was that of bailor and bailee. As such bailee, or depositary for hire, defendant was bound to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. National Safe Deposit Co. v. SteadIllinois Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Mayer v. BrensingerIllinois Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Bauman v. National Safe Deposit Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1906

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bohmont v. MooreNebraska Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Henderick v. Uptown Safe Deposit Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1959
  3. Schaefer v. Washington Safety Deposit Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API