Legal Opinion

Regional Convention and Sports Complex Authority, Plaintiff/Respondent v. City of St. Louis, Defendant/Respondent, Jeanette Oxford, Proposed Intervenors/Appellants.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 27, 2016No. ED103320-01Published

1Opinion of the CourtRoy L. Richter, Judge

Jeanette Oxford, William White, and Earl Garrett (collectively, “Appellants”) appeal from the trial court’s judgment denying Appellants’ right to intervene in the action below and the invalidation of a St. Louis City ordinance. The only issue we address in this appeal is whether or not the trial court erred in denying intervention to Appellants. Finding no error, we affirm. 1

I. BACKGROUND

The action before the trial court in which Appellants attempted to intervene concerned the validity of City Ordinance 66509 (“the Ordinance”), codified as Chapter 3.91 of the Revised Code of the City of St.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Nixon v. American Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2000
  2. Moore v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2011
  3. State v. MayesSupreme Court of Missouri · 2001
  4. State of Missouri ex rel. Attorney General Chris Koster and the Missouri Petroleum Storage Tank Insurance Fund Board of Directors v. ConocoPhillips Company and Phillips 66 Company, and Cory WagonerSupreme Court of Missouri · 2016
  5. Crystal Tire Co. v. Home Service Oil Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1975

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API