Kranenberg v. TKRS Pub, Inc.

*770The relevant facts are set forth in a related appeal (see Kranenberg v TKRS Pub, Inc., 99 AD3d 767 [2012] [decided herewith]).

In his original papers submitted in opposition to the defendants’ motion for summary judgment, the plaintiff submitted a videotape without any evidence of its authenticity and, thus, the Supreme Court declined to consider it. The Supreme Court granted those branches of the defendants’ motion which were for summary judgment dismissing the first and third causes of action, and the plaintiff subsequently moved, inter alia, for leave to renew his opposition to those…