Legal Opinion

Vander Boegh v. Bank of Oklahoma, N.A.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided February 8, 2013No. 2011-CA-000921-MRPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

MOORE, Judge:

The above-captioned appellants are minority beneficiaries of two separate trusts, and they appeal an order and judgment of the McCracken Circuit Court concerning the construction of certain trust documents and a petition for instructions filed by their trustee, Bank of Oklahoma, N.A. (“BOK”). For the reasons discussed below, we affirm.

It becomes necessary to discuss the posture of the Vander Boeghs’ appeal before we address the arguments they have raised. This opinion is the result of a petition for reconsideration by the Vander Boeghs, which they filed in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Elwell v. StoneCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1990
  2. St. Luke Hospital, Inc. v. StraubKentucky Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Ready v. JamisonKentucky Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Brown v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Louisville & Jefferson County Metropolitan Sewer District v. BischoffKentucky Supreme Court · 2007

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Baker v. Blackhawk Mining, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2024
  2. Karen Sloan v. Bank of Oklahoma (Now Known as "Bokf"), N.A., as Trustee of the Charles R. Jones, Sr. Inter Vivos TrustCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API