Legal Opinion

Reavis v. Reavis

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 15, 1986No. 8522DC1255PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EAGLES, Judge.

The determinative question here is whether the trial court had authority to order repayment of a portion of the lump sum, which in obedience to a final judgment had been paid in full. Defendant argues that the lump sum payment represented at least in part a property settlement, and therefore could not be modified since it had been fully executed. Plaintiff argues that the $17,000.00 was paid solely for child support and that orders for child support, including lump sum payments, are modifiable at any time.

I

We first consider what type of question this appeal presents in order to…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Walters v. WaltersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  2. Rowe v. RoweSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  3. Lawing v. LawingCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  4. Bunker v. Bunker.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  5. White v. GrahamCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Blevins v. WelchCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  2. Faucette v. 6303 Carmel Road, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015
  3. Cleveland Construction, Inc. v. Ellis-Don Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  4. Kniep v. TempletonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  5. Goff v. GoffCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API