Legal Opinion

Jung-Leonczynska v. Steup

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided December 28, 1990No. 90-144, 90-145PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOLDEN, Justice.

We visit this case for a second time. As in the first appeal, the primary issue to be addressed is the propriety of the grant of a motion for summary judgment.

We will, once again, reverse the district court’s entry of summary judgment.

In the first appeal, we determined that the issue of whether a public employee was acting within the scope of his duties under W.S. l-39-104(a) (June 1988 Repl.) when he allegedly engaged in tortious conduct, was a question of fact for the trier of fact and not one for the court in the context of a motion for summary judgment. Jung-Leonczynska v.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jung-Leonczynska v. SteupWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Matthews v. Wyoming Department of AgricultureWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Clayton v. Board of EducationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
  4. Clayton v. Board of Education of Central School District No. 1Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Mark Daniel Byerly v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2019
  2. State, Wyoming Game & Fish Commission v. ThornockWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Leger v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Automatic Gas Distributors, Inc. v. State Bank of Green RiverWyoming Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Automatic Gas Distributors, Inc. v. State Bank of Green RiverWyoming Supreme Court · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API