Legal Opinion
United States v. Tucor International, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 25, 2001No. 00-10167PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
TASHIMA, Circuit Judge:
Appellants are motor carriers and their officers who were prosecuted for antitrust violations but were ultimately exonerated, because their conduct was found to be covered by an antitrust immunity provision of the Shipping Act of 1984, 46 App. U.S.C. §§ 1701-1719. Appellants then moved for attorney’s fees and costs under the Hyde Amendment. Pub. L. No. 105-119, Title VI, § 617, 111 Stat. 2519 (1997), reprinted in 18 U.S.C. § 3006A (historical and statutory notes). The district court denied the motion. We have jurisdiction of this timely appeal under 28 U.S.C. § 1291,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Koon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Donald M. PARADIS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. A.J. ARAVE, Warden, Idaho State Penitentiary, Respondent-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Erik LindbergCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Transpacific Westbound Rate Agreement, and Asia North America Eastbound Agreement, Intervenor v. Federal Maritime Commission, United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. Tucor International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001