Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Hejda

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 6, 1929No. 5134PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Judge NICKELS

delivered the opinion of the Commission of Appeals, Section A.

statement of the case.

September 12, 1925, the State of Texas, acting by its District Attorney, filed petition in the District Court, Stephens County, Ninetieth Judicial District, in which Lucille Hejda is named as defendant. Exclusive of formal parts, the petition’s averments are: “That the defendant * * * on or prior to the 22hd day of August, A. D. 1925, at the Hampton Hotel, on E. Walker Street, Breckenridge, in Stephens County, in’ the State of Texas, kept at said place and sold to F. T. Cullen and diverse…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Frank v. MangumSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  2. Moore v. DempseySupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. Roller v. HollySupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  4. CuddySupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  5. Ekern v. McGovernWisconsin Supreme Court · 1913

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ex Parte DavisTexas Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Sandoval v. RattikinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965
  3. Sandoval v. RattikinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API