Legal Opinion

Breeding v. Excise Board of Oklahoma County

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 22, 1937No. 27757PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, J.

Plaintiffs in error, protestants below, filed in the Court of Tax Review their protest against the ad valorem tax levied for the general fund of Oklahoma City for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 1936. The ground of protest was that no tax levy was needed for the reason that the funds in hand at the beginning of the fiscal year and the amount of probable income from sources other than ad valorem taxation were sufficient for the needs of the general fund of the city for the fiscal year in question. Prom the judgment denying the protest the protestants have appealed.

The city council of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. City of Ardmore v. Excise BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  2. Grubb v. SmileySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  3. Protest of St Louis-S. F. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  4. Bartlesville Water Co. v. BrannSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Texas- Empire Pipe Line Co. v. Tulsa CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  2. Branch v. Oklahoma County Excise BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API