Lickliter v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
1Opinion of the Court
OpmioN op the Court by
Judge Richardson
Affirming.
On a former trial of this prosecution, Lickliter was convicted and his punishment fixed at five years in the State Reformatory. On an .appeal to this court the judgment was reversed and the prosecution remanded with directions to grant him a new trial. On a second trial, he was convicted and his punishment fixed at eight years in the reformatory. Hence this appeal.
The opinion on the first appeal, 249 Ky. 95, 60 S. W. (2d) 355, 356, is the law of the case. Helton v. Commonwealth, 254 Ky. 290, 71 S. W. (2d) 625.
The sole question now presented is:…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Simmons v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924
- Lickliter v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
- Blankenship v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
- Fleming v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927
- Beach v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Reed v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938
- Canter v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938
- Bigby v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938
- Davis v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1937
- Salyers v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.