Legal Opinion

People v. Hayes

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 19, 1996PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant contends that County Court erred in permitting the People to introduce into evidence the terms of the cooperation agreement with the codefendant, who testified on behalf of the People. We disagree. In his opening statement, defense counsel had attacked the credibility of the codefendant by pointing out his interest in testifying and his motive to fabricate. In response, the People were properly permitted to elicit the bolstering aspect of the cooperation agreement, i.e., the promise by the codefendant to testify truthfully (see, United…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. BurkeNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. People of State of New York v. CherryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  3. People v. GibbsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  4. People v. BurkeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  5. People v. RiveraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. BaezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  2. People v. SantanaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  3. People v. ThompsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  4. People v. PerezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  5. People v. ThompsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API