Legal Opinion

Rhodes v. Arthur

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 12, 1907PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error from the District Court of Pottawatomie County; before B. F. Burwell, Trial Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the court by

Burford, C. J.:

The defendant in error, Charles M. Arthur, was the owner of a tract of land in Pottawatomie county, Oklahoma, which he sold to the plaintiff in error, Fred W. Ehodes, for the agreed price of $1,850, and took in payment therefor certain lots at the agreed price $600 and a certain note and mortgage held by Bhodes for the balance of the purchase money. This note was for the sum of $1,150, secured by a deed of trust executed by John Myers upon certain real estate in the state of Missouri, and upon which a payment of $500 had been made. This action is one by…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Fouch v. WilsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  2. McDole v. PurdySupreme Court of Iowa · 1867
  3. Tobey v. McAllisterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1859
  4. Graham v. MoffettMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Gilbert v. BakesIndiana Supreme Court · 1886

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kee v. SatterfieldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. Rogers v. CrockettIdaho Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Blain v. SpencerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API