Legal Opinion

Ottinger v. Walling

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 24, 1939No. Appeal, 254PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Barnes,

The plaintiff, on May 9,1935, while employed as a fireman on defendants’ barge, fell and was injured. Subsequently he brought suit in the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County under the Act of Congress known as the Jones Act * to recover damages for the injuries sustained. At the trial which followed the court instructed the jury that if plaintiff’s injuries were caused by the defendants’ lack of care, he was entitled to recover for his necessary medical expenses, pain and suffering, and loss of past wages for such time as he was disabled, as well as for…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. The OsceolaSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  2. Cortes v. Baltimore Insular Line, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Chelentis v. Luckenbach Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
  4. Pacific Steamship Co. v. PetersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  5. Carlisle Packing Co. v. SandangerSupreme Court of the United States · 1922

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Zimmer v. ZimmerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Loughran v. MatylewiczSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  3. Muise v. AbbottDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1945
  4. Thornes v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1940
  5. Larsen v. LarsenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API