New Deal Cab Co. v. Fahs
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SIBLEY, Circuit Judge.
Social Security taxes were assessed against and paid under protest by New Deal Cab Company for the years 1941, 1942, and 1943; refund was sought and denied, and the Collector is sued for their recovery. The district judge, sitting without a jury, found that the drivers of the Company’s cabs were its employees and taxes were due in respect of their earnings as wages under the cases which then seemed controlling, United States v. Silk, 331 U.S. 704, 67 S.Ct. 1463, 91 L.Ed. 1757; Bartels v. Birmingham, 332 U.S. 126, 67 S.Ct. 1547, 91 L. Ed. 1947, 172 A.L.R. 317, and Fahs v.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. SilkSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Bartels v. BirminghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Party Cab Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1949
- Fahs v. Tree-Gold Co-Op. Growers of Florida, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1948
3Cited by14 opinions
- Nazario v. VélezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1969
- United States v. T. S. Fleming and James E. Fleming, Jr., D/B/A City Transportation Company, and City Transportation Company of TylerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
- Messenger Courier Ass'n of Americas v. California Unemployment Insurance Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Jenkins v. PeddieSupreme Court of Florida · 1962
- Jjr, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1997
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.