Legal Opinion

Dusy v. Prudom

California Supreme Court

Decided August 18, 1892No. 18024PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Fresno County. The facts are stated.in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtPaterson, J.

This is an action to foreclose the lien of a material-man. The cause was commenced and determined in the superior court of Fresno County. The defendants, Frank J. and Charles Prudom, who were residents of San Joaquin County, appeared and filed an answer to the complaint on April 20, 1891. The case was tried on November 4, 1891, and a decree in favor of the plaintiff was entered on the same day. The decree recites that the defendants Prudom failed to appear at *648the trial of the cause. On November 16, 1891, the defendants Prudom gave notice of an application to set aside the judgment, on the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Eltzroth v. RyanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Peters v. WalkerIdaho Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Ransome-Crummey Co. v. WoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  3. Bell v. PeckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Lovell v. LovellIdaho Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Richards v. RichardsIdaho Supreme Court · 1913

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API