William E. Leventhal v. United States Department of Labor, and City of Los Angeles
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
ALARCON, Circuit Judge:
William Leventhal appeals a decision of an Administrative Law Judge [AU] for the Department of Labor rejecting his claims that the City of Los Angeles fired him in retaliation for reporting violations of the Comprehensive Employment and Training Act [CETA], and that the City denied him procedural due process. We affirm.
I
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
The City of Los Angeles hired William Leventhal in August 1979 to monitor city programs under the Comprehensive Employment Training Act. 1 On March 7, 1980, the City suspended Leventhal for five days for insubordination and verbal…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Carey v. PiphusSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. GraysonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Henry GALLANT, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Margaret M. HECKLER, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Donnie Collins v. United States Department of Labor Columbus/franklin County ConsortiumCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986