Legal Opinion

In Re Veasey

United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided October 18, 1984No. 19-10469PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EMIL F. GOLDHABER, Chief Judge:

The issue at bench is whether a mortgage which was inadvertently satisfied through an error of the mortgagee may be reinstated. The question is presented on the mortgagee’s action for a determination of the secured status of its lien against the debtor’s property. We conclude that, under the circumstances of this case, the mortgage should be reinstated.

The facts of this case are as follows: 1 On September 11, 1981, Nancy L. Veasey (“the debtor”) gave a mortgage on her property to the Philadelphia Saving Fund Society (“the mortgagee”) to secure a loan in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Quin v. CallahanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1889
  2. St. Clement's B. & L. Ass'n v. McCannSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  3. McKee v. Wilson Et Ux.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re Morysville Body Works, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Bank of America, N.A. v. Welsh (In re Welsh)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API