Legal Opinion
Ago
Florida Attorney General Reports
Decided August 25, 1975Published
1Opinion of the Court
QUESTION: Is a person "summoned" before the Florida Elections Commission by reason of such person's alleged violation(s) of Ch.106, F.S., who is the subject of a hearing before the commission entitled to the travel expense and per diem benefits provided by s. 106.26(3)?
SUMMARY: A person who, by reason of such person's alleged violation(s) of Ch. 106., F.S., is the subject of a hearing before the Florida Elections Commission is entitled to the travel expense and per diem benefits provided by s. 106.26(3) only if his presence at such hearing is compelled by service upon him of a subpoena or…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Gaulden v. KirkSupreme Court of Florida · 1950
- American Bankers Life Assur. Co. of Fla. v. WilliamsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968
- Pedersen v. GreenSupreme Court of Florida · 1958
- The Florida Bar v. RaymanSupreme Court of Florida · 1970
- Gasson v. GaySupreme Court of Florida · 1950
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.