In re Brosnahan
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Missouri
On Writ of Habeas Corpus.
1Opinion of the Court
Miller, Justice.
The prisoner in this case is brought before us by virtue of a writ of habeas corpus issued under the authority of this court, and directed to John W. Rucker, in whoso custody the petitioner stated himself to be. To this writ Mr. Rucker, at the time of producing the body of his prisoner, makes return that he holds him* in custody by virtue of a precept to him directed as constable by A. W. Allen, a justice of the peace of Jackson county, Missouri, and he annexes a copy of the mittimus as a part of his return. From this it appears that a criminal proceeding bad been instituted…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited89 opinions
- Ex Parte McCardleSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
- Martin v. Hunter's LesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1816
- Brown v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
- Ex Parte SieboldSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Bank of Columbia v. OkelySupreme Court of the United States · 1819
84 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Sunal v. LargeSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States v. Filippo Sacco AKA John RosselliCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- Bobbs-Merrill Co. v. StrausCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1906
- Ex parte GouyetDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1909
- Six Wheel Corp. v. Sterling Motor Truck Co. of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1931
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.