Legal Opinion

(PS) Roberts v. Sacramento Housing & Redevelopment Agency

District Court, E.D. California

Decided July 30, 2025No. 2:22-cv-01699Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SYDNEY BROOKE ROBERTS and No. 2:22-cv-1699 TLN AC PS DAVID TYRONE SAMUEL, 12 Plaintiffs, 13 ORDER and FINDINGS AND v. RECOMMENDATIONS 14 SACRAMENTO HOUSING & 15 REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, et al., 16 Defendants. 17 18 Plaintiffs are proceeding in this action pro se. The action was accordingly referred to the 19 undersigned for pretrial matters by E.D. Cal. R. (“Local Rule”) 302(c)(21). Before the 20 undersigned is defendants’ motion to enforce the parties’ agreement to settle (ECF No. 124), 21 which…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  2. Golden v. California Emergency Physicians Medical GroupCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  3. Lopez v. CHARLES SCHWAB & CO., INC.California Court of Appeal · 2004
  4. Andreyev v. First National Bank of Omaha (In Re Andreyev)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API