Layne v. Zoning Board of Adjustment
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
McDERMOTT, Justice.
This case arose from the denial by the Zoning Board of Adjustment of the City of Pittsburgh of appellee’s request to occupy the property she leases in Pittsburgh as a boarding house. That decision, as affirmed by the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny County, was based upon the fact that appellee’s property is located in an R-4 residential district where under § 937.02 of the Pittsburgh Code boarding homes are not permitted. The Commonwealth Court,1 however, reasoned that boarding homes could not be rationally excluded from the R-4 residential districts…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- National Land & Investment Co. v. Easttown Township Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Schubach v. SilverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Bilbar Construction Co. v. Easttown Township Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
- Glorioso AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
- Layne v. Zoning Board of AdjustmentCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
3Cited by11 opinions
- McClimans v. Board of SupervisorsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Farley v. Zoning Hearing Board of Lower Merion TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Ficco v. Board of SupervisorsCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Appeal of Geiger v. Zoning Hearing BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- St. Margaret Memorial Hospital v. Borough Council of AspinwallCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.