Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Marshall

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided February 25, 1982No. C-1-80-666Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING A PETITION FOR HABEAS CORPUS

SPIEGEL, District Judge:

Petitioner, a state prisoner, brings this action for a writ of habeas corpus under the provisions of Title 28. U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner has been granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis and is proceeding pro se. This matter is before the Court on the petition, the return of writ, and the briefs and exhibits of the parties.

Petitioner was indicted by the September, 1972 term of the Stark County Grand Jury for first degree murder in violation of former Ohio Revised Code § 2901.01. The matter was tried to a jury…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Townsend v. SainSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. WILWORDING Et Al. v. SWENSON, WARDENSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Millard Robert Beasley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974
  4. United States v. Stanley YelardyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978
  5. Fate Thomas, Sheriff, Nashville Metropolitan Jail v. Mark Jerome BeasleyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API