Legal Opinion

First Nat. Bank v. Noyes

District Court, D. Alaska

Decided September 30, 1916No. 2038Published

The original bill filed in this action on the 6th of July, 1914, sets forth separately five causes of action against the defendant.

Read the full summary

The original bill filed in this action on the 6th of July, 1914, sets forth separately five causes of action against the defendant. It is alleged in each cause of action that the First National Bank of Fairbanks is a national banking association of the United States, duly organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the United States and engaged in a general banking business in the town of Fairbanks, Alaska; that its paid-up capital stock is the sum of $50,000, consisting of 500 shares, of the par value of $100 each; that the management and control of its business and affairs was…

1Opinion of the Court

BUNNELL, District Judge.

The greater part of the argument in urging the motion to strike the amended complaint, and in resisting the same, centers around the proper interpretation of 'the principles laid down in Yates v. Jones National Bank, 206 U. S. 158, 27 Sup. Ct. 638, 51 L. Ed. 1002, The mas *563V. Taylor, 224 U. S. 73, 32 Sup. Ct. 403, 56 L. Ed. 673, and Jones National Bank v. Yates, 240 U. S. 541, 36 Sup. Ct. 429, 60 L. Ed. 788.

In the matter now before the court, plaintiffs contention is simply this: Eeave has been granted to file an amended complaint and attached thereto exhibits of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Yates v. Jones National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  2. Thomas v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  3. Jones National Bank v. YatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  4. Williams v. BradyDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1916
  5. Kramer v. GilleU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Missouri · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API