Legal Opinion
Fumi Hata, Personal Representative of the Estate of Arnold S. Hata v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 26, 1994No. 92-56142PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge SNEED
SNEED, Circuit Judge.
Appellant Fumi Hata (Hata) challenges the district court’s dismissal of her Military Claims Act (MCA) suit for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We AFFIRM.
I
FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS BELOW
Appellant’s late husband, Sgt. Arnold S. Hata, was stationed at Kadena Air Base in Okinawa, Japan. On April 22, 1990, Sgt. Hata went to the emergency room at Camp Lester Naval Hospital complaining of severe chest pain. The doctor in charge of the emergency room ordered pain relievers for Sgt. Hata and sent him on his way. However, his chest pains continued, and he…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Feres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Block v. Community Nutrition InstituteSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Richard E. Collins v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Real Property Located at 475 Martin LaneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Michael Schneider Roisin Schneider, Individually and as Guardians of Slaine Schneider v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
- Minns v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1998
- Charles R. JACKSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.