Legal Opinion

Cane Belt Railway Co. v. Crosson

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 10, 1905PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Matagorda. Tried below before Hon. Wells Thompson.

1Opinion of the Court

GILL, Associate Justice.

W. M. Crosson sued the railway company for damages for personal injuries sustained by him from a fall from a moving handcar while in the employment of the company as a section hand. The company answered by general denial, by the averment that the injuries complained of were due to unavoidable accident, and specially alleged that plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence in standing on the handcar without holding to the handlebars. A trial by jury resulted in a verdict and judgment for plaintiff, from which the defendant has appealed.

The facts are as follows:…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. McGlamoryTexas Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ft. Worth & D. C. Ry. Co. v. StalcupCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  2. Gestean v. BishopCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
  3. Galveston, H. & S. A. Ry. Co. v. SampleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
  4. Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. CrowCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  5. Ft. Worth & D. C. Ry. Co. v. StalcupCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API