Legal Opinion

Bailey v. USF Holland, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided May 16, 2008No. 07-5304PublishedCited by 69 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GRIFFIN, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiffs Bobby Bailey and Robert Smith, both African-American, were dock workers and truck drivers for defendant USF Holland, Inc. After making numerous complaints over the course of several years regarding their coworkers’ habit of referring to them as “boy,” “hey boy,” or “damn it boy,” and subjecting them to other forms of racial harassment, plaintiffs sued defendant for violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Tennessee Human Rights Act. Following a non-jury trial, the district court ruled for plaintiffs and awarded damages. We affirm.

I

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Campbell v. Florida Steel Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Ash v. Tyson Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
  5. Linda Jackson v. Quanex CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by69 opinions

  1. William Tennial v. United Parcel Serv.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
  2. Everett Chattman v. Toho Tenax America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
  3. Johnson v. Pride IndustriesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2021
  4. Donna Mullins v. Goodyear Tire and Rubber CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  5. Davis v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API