Legal Opinion

State v. Smith

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 15, 1890PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Appeal from, Rice District Court. The opinion, filed during the June session, 1890, of this court, contains a sufficient statement of the case.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Simpson, C.:

At the regular January term, 1890, of the district court of Rice county, the appellants, James Smith, John Smith, and Martin Smith, were placed *76upon their trial, charged with burglary and larceny. They waived arraignment, entered a plea of not guilty, a jury was sworn, and the state and the defendants both submitted their evidence. All this took place on the 10th day of January. When the court met on the morning of the 11th of January, counsel for appellants asked permission to introduce further evidence in their behalf. The jurors were called, and all were present and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ClueSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1831
  2. State v. WhiteSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
  3. State v. MyrickSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888
  4. State v. ShuchardtNebraska Supreme Court · 1885

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. ReedSupreme Court of Kansas · 1894
  2. State v. SandstromSupreme Court of Kansas · 1979
  3. State v. WaySupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  4. The People v. McGraneIllinois Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Percer v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1907

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API