Legal Opinion
Taylor v. Southern Pennsylvania Bus Co.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided November 13, 1963No. Appeal, No. 136PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
Pee Cueiam,
The six judges who heard the argument of this appeal being equally divided in opinion, the judgment of the lower- court is affirmed.
Opinion by Woodside, J., April 14, 1964:
This is an appeal from a judgment for the plaintiffs entered on a case stated. It involves the amount of vacation pay to which former employes of the defendant are entitled.
A collective bargaining agreement between the parties covered the period of two years from March 21,' 1958 to March 21, 1960. The agreement was not renewed and the plaintiffs performed no services for the' defendant after it was…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In Re Wil-Low CafeteriasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
- Silverstein v. HornickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
- Oluschak Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
- TEXTILE, ETC., AM. v. Paris Fabric Mills, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
- Pramco, Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Taylor v. Southern Pennsylvania Bus Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
- Hahn v. City of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County1973
- Taylor v. Southern Pennsylvania Bus Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965