Legal Opinion

Sling v. Royal Insurance

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1892PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from judgments of the district court of the first district and from orders refusing new trials. The opinion states the facts. Cited Johnson v. Insurance Go., 91 Ill. 92; Fullcm v. N. Y. U. Ins. Go., 7 Gray, 61; Blair v. Sovereign Ins. Go., 19 IT. S. E. 372; Chambers y. Atlas Ins. Go., 61 Conn. 17, s. c. 50 Am. E. 1; Bradley v. Phoenix Ins. Go., 28 Mo. Ap. 7; Dickie y. Western Ass. Go., 21 N. B. E. 544; Ins. Go. y. Lacroix, 35 Tex. 249, s. c. 14 Am. E’ 370; Glass y.

Read the full summary

Appeal from judgments of the district court of the first district and from orders refusing new trials. The opinion states the facts. Cited Johnson v. Insurance Go., 91 Ill. 92; Fullcm v. N. Y. U. Ins. Go., 7 Gray, 61; Blair v. Sovereign Ins. Go., 19 IT. S. E. 372; Chambers y. Atlas Ins. Go., 61 Conn. 17, s. c. 50 Am. E. 1; Bradley v. Phoenix Ins. Go., 28 Mo. Ap. 7; Dickie y. Western Ass. Go., 21 N. B. E. 544; Ins. Go. y. Lacroix, 35 Tex. 249, s. c. 14 Am. E’ 370; Glass y. Walker, 66 Mo. 32; Wilson y. Ins. Go., 27 Vt. 102; Blanks y. Ins. Go., 36 La. An. 599; Ins. Go. y. Barr, 94 Pa. St. 345,…

1Opinion of the Court

ANDERSON, J.:

These actions were brought on policies of insurance against loss by fire, issued by the defendant companies to the plaintiff on a stock of Chinese and Japanese goods. The first two of the cases were tried together, and by stipulation of counsel the judgment in the third was^.to be the same as that in the first, the terms of the policies sued on in these two cases being substantially the same. The same stipulation between counsel has been made in this court, so that we haye only. to consider the first two of the cases, all of them being presented in one record.

At the trial in the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Riddlesbarger v. Hartford InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  2. Steen v. . Niagara Fire Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  3. Holmes v. RichetCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Killips v. Putnam Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1871
  5. Arthur v. . Homestead Fire Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1879

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Read & Traversy v. State InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
  2. Stewart v. National Council of Knights & Ladies of SecuritySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  3. Egan v. Oakland InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Wever v. Pioneer Fire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  5. McFarland v. Railway Officials & Employees Accident Ass'nWyoming Supreme Court · 1894

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API