Legal Opinion

Bruner v. Kansas Moline Plow Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 13, 1909No. 791PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Original motion in the Supreme Court by H. S. Bruner and others against the Kansas Moline Plow Company to retax costs.

1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.

The plaintiffs -in error move this court to retax the costs in the above-entitled cause, on the ground that the fees -or costs taxed in the trial court and in the United States Court of Appeals for the Indian Territory are in excess of those allowed by law.

The 'only way that this court may re-examine the taxing of costs in the 'trial court is on appeal, by means of a bill of exceptions or case-made; and this being an original motion filed in this court, as to the costs taxed in the trial court, the same, as to such costs, is denied for want of jurisdiction of this court.

It further appears…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cable v. MyersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  2. German-American Ins. Co. v. NewbornSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  3. Illinois Bankers Life Assurance Co. v. BellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API