Legal Opinion

Mains v. Whiting

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 28, 1891PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error to Calhoun. (Hooker, J.) Case. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Champlin, 0. J.

The plaintiff brought suit against the defendant for verbal slander.

The original declaration set out the words declared to be defamatory, as follows: “You are the dirty sewer through which all the slums of this embezzlement have flowed;” and again, “You are the dirty sewer through which all the slums of this embezzlement have been forced;” and again, “If that $20 had been turned over *173to .you or to Van Wagner, the company would never have seen 20 cents of it.”

It is not necessary to set out in detail the terms of the' original declaration, for the reason that defendant demurred,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Pollard v. LyonSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Fowles v. . BowenNew York Court of Appeals · 1864
  3. People v. M'KayNew York Supreme Court · 1820
  4. Larrabee v. Minnesota Tribune Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
  5. McKee v. . WilsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1882

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Croton v. GillisMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Chiatovich v. HanchettU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada · 1898
  3. Simmons Ford, Inc. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1980
  4. Swagman v. Swift and Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. Lakin v. RundMichigan Supreme Court · 2016

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API