Legal Opinion

Aurnou v. Greenspan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided August 9, 1990PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Motion and cross motion granted only insofar as to amend the memorandum decision (161 AD2d 438) filed on May 17, 1990 by changing the last sentence of the second paragraph thereof to read as follows: "At the same time, prior to plaintiff’s withdrawal, the firm agreed to receive its $200,000 contingency fee at the rate of $50,000 per year over a four-year period.” It is further ordered that last two sentences of first paragraph on third page of aforesaid memorandum decision (supra, at 439) are amended to read as follows: "With a one-third overhead reduction, it would appear to be $422. Thus,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Aurnou v. GreenspanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Eighteen Holding Corp. v. DrizinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API