Opinion of the Justices
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
The title of S.B. 133 is as follows:
A BILL TO BE ENTITLED AN ACT
Relating to the development of the Elk River Watershed area; creating the Elk River Development Agency as an agency of the State of Alabama for such purpose; providing for its incorporation as a public body corporate; prescribing its authority, powers, duties, functions, and management; authorizing the agency to issue bonds, and *99the counties of Lauderdale and Limestone and municipalities therein to contribute funds and levy taxes for its use.
The Senate of Alabama.State Capitol
Montgomery, Alabama
Gentlemen:
We are in receipt of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Wallace v. Board of Revenue of Jefferson CountySupreme Court of Alabama · 1903
- State Ex Rel. Montgomery v. MerrillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
- Trailway Oil Company v. City of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1960
- State ex rel. Attorney General v. SayreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1904
- Stone v. State Ex Rel. CourtneySupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Horgan v. DAUPHIN ISLAND WATER, ETC.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1982