Legal Opinion

Opinion of the Justices

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 8, 1965No. 182PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The title of S.B. 133 is as follows:

A BILL TO BE ENTITLED AN ACT

Relating to the development of the Elk River Watershed area; creating the Elk River Development Agency as an agency of the State of Alabama for such purpose; providing for its incorporation as a public body corporate; prescribing its authority, powers, duties, functions, and management; authorizing the agency to issue bonds, and *99the counties of Lauderdale and Limestone and municipalities therein to contribute funds and levy taxes for its use.

The Senate of Alabama.State Capitol

Montgomery, Alabama

Gentlemen:

We are in receipt of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wallace v. Board of Revenue of Jefferson CountySupreme Court of Alabama · 1903
  2. State Ex Rel. Montgomery v. MerrillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  3. Trailway Oil Company v. City of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1960
  4. State ex rel. Attorney General v. SayreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1904
  5. Stone v. State Ex Rel. CourtneySupreme Court of Alabama · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Horgan v. DAUPHIN ISLAND WATER, ETC.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API