State v. Arquette
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtBjorgen, J.
¶1 Following a bench trial, Nick Taylor Arquette was found guilty of first degree perjury. Arquette appeals his conviction, asserting that (1) sufficient evidence did not support his conviction and (2) his conviction subjected him to double jeopardy. We consolidated Arquette’s direct appeal with his personal restraint petition (PRP), in which he argues that (1) sufficient evidence did not support his previous conviction for second degree perjury following a jury trial and (2) his previous appellate counsel was ineffective for failing to challenge the sufficiency of evidence in his previous…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- State v. SalinasWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. DelmarterWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- In Re the Personal Restraint of CookWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- Brogan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re the Personal Restraint of CrowCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
- Personal Restraint Petition Of Tommy Lee Crow, Jr.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2015
- State of Washington v. Delbert Harold BensonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018