Legal Opinion

State v. Arquette

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided December 10, 2013No. Nos. 42546-7-II; 42974-8-IIPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBjorgen, J.

¶1 Following a bench trial, Nick Taylor Arquette was found guilty of first degree perjury. Arquette appeals his conviction, asserting that (1) sufficient evidence did not support his conviction and (2) his conviction subjected him to double jeopardy. We consolidated Arquette’s direct appeal with his personal restraint petition (PRP), in which he argues that (1) sufficient evidence did not support his previous conviction for second degree perjury following a jury trial and (2) his previous appellate counsel was ineffective for failing to challenge the sufficiency of evidence in his previous…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. State v. SalinasWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State v. DelmarterWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  4. In Re the Personal Restraint of CookWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Brogan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re the Personal Restraint of CrowCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  2. Personal Restraint Petition Of Tommy Lee Crow, Jr.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  3. State of Washington v. Delbert Harold BensonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API