Borgen v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BULLOCK, Justice.
This is a sexual abuse case that comes to us on remand from the Court of Criminal Appeals.
Upon initial submission of this case, a panel of this court held that a comment by the prosecutor, during the guilt phase of the trial, constituted reversible error notwithstanding the absence of an objection by appellant. Borgen v. State, 657 S.W.2d 15 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 1983). We reversed and remanded this cause for a new trial. The Court of Criminal Appeals granted the state’s petition for review and held: (1) that the comment by the prosecutor was improper; but (2)…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Todd v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
- Romo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
- Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976
- Borgen v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
- Pemberton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Stone v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1988
- Thomas v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1991
- Jones v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1987
- Oliver v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1991
- Oliver v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.