Legal Opinion

Borgen v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided November 15, 1984No. 01-82-0278-CRPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BULLOCK, Justice.

This is a sexual abuse case that comes to us on remand from the Court of Criminal Appeals.

Upon initial submission of this case, a panel of this court held that a comment by the prosecutor, during the guilt phase of the trial, constituted reversible error notwithstanding the absence of an objection by appellant. Borgen v. State, 657 S.W.2d 15 (Tex.App.-Houston [1st Dist.] 1983). We reversed and remanded this cause for a new trial. The Court of Criminal Appeals granted the state’s petition for review and held: (1) that the comment by the prosecutor was improper; but (2)…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Todd v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
  2. Romo v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
  3. Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976
  4. Borgen v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
  5. Pemberton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Stone v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1988
  2. Thomas v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1991
  3. Jones v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1987
  4. Oliver v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1991
  5. Oliver v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API