Legal Opinion

In re Perquimans County Drainage District No. Four

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 1, 1961PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

The North Carolina Pulp Company states in the record its “only exception is to the conclusions of law of the trial judge.” It does not on this appeal challenge the findings of fact made by the clerk, its exceptions to which findings were dismissed by Judge Bone.

Other than the appeal entries, the record contains only the unverified motion, the order of the clerk with the assignment of errors thereto by the North Carolina Pulp Company, and the order of Judge Bone, and a stipulation of the parties that the record shall contain paragraphs 10 and 13 of the final report of the board of viewers as…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Collins v. North Carolina State Highway & Public Works CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  2. Woodard v. ClarkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  3. State v. . JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
  4. Blue v. . BlueSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878
  5. Adams v. . JoynerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. City of Randleman v. HinshawSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API