Legal Opinion

Shaw v. McQueeney

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided May 15, 1914PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the City Court of the City of New York, entered in favor of the plaintiff for the sum of $723.57, besides costs, upon the verdict of a jury.

1Opinion of the CourtGuy, J.

This action is brought to recover commissions. Plaintiff and defendant were agents of a corporation known as the Domestic Utilities Manufacturing Company in the sale of vacuum clothes washers in wholesale lots called contracts. Plaintiff purchased through defendant, who held a $5,000 contract of agency, what is called a $150 contract of agency. These contracts entitled the agent to sell 50 vacuum clothes washers or 75 oven flues for $150; 1667 vacuum clothes washers or 2500 oven flues for $5,000, and intervening numbers at proportionate prices. Such sales were to be made strictly pursuant to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Clews v. JamiesonSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  2. Horton v. . MorganNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
  3. Peabody v. . SpeyersNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  4. Springs v. JamesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
  5. Leo v. . McCormackNew York Court of Appeals · 1906

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Shaw v. McQueenieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API