United States v. Alejandro Umana
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1DissentGregory, Circuit Judge
The government used unconfronted accusations from police informants to send a man to his death. I strongly believe that this violated Mr. Umaña’s Sixth Amendment rights. My full reasoning is set out in my dissent. United States v. Umaña, 750 F.3d 320, 360-70 (4th Cir.2014). With all due respect, I consider our refusal to rehear this case en banc to be a grave mistake. However, I write today to explain why I believe that Supreme Court review of Mr. Umaña’s argument is warranted.
I believe Supreme Court review is vital because this Court and the district court misread the past five decades of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Williams v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- United States v. FieldsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.