Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Alejandro Umana

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided August 12, 2014No. 10-6Published

1DissentGregory, Circuit Judge

The government used unconfronted accusations from police informants to send a man to his death. I strongly believe that this violated Mr. Umaña’s Sixth Amendment rights. My full reasoning is set out in my dissent. United States v. Umaña, 750 F.3d 320, 360-70 (4th Cir.2014). With all due respect, I consider our refusal to rehear this case en banc to be a grave mistake. However, I write today to explain why I believe that Supreme Court review of Mr. Umaña’s argument is warranted.

I believe Supreme Court review is vital because this Court and the district court misread the past five decades of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  4. Williams v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. United States v. FieldsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API