Sargent v. . St. Mary's Orphan Boys' Asylum
New York Court of Appeals
Appeal from an order of the Ajipellate Division of the, Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered June 8, 1006, which reversed an order of Special Term confirming the report of a referee appointed herein to assess tlie -damages sustained by appellants by reason of a temporary injunction. The facts, so far as material, are stated in the opinion. The damages allowed by the referee were properly recoverable on this motion. (Perlman v. Bernstein, 93 App.
Read the full summary
Appeal from an order of the Ajipellate Division of the, Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered June 8, 1006, which reversed an order of Special Term confirming the report of a referee appointed herein to assess tlie -damages sustained by appellants by reason of a temporary injunction. The facts, so far as material, are stated in the opinion. The damages allowed by the referee were properly recoverable on this motion. (Perlman v. Bernstein, 93 App. Div. 335; 179 N. Y. 531; Holcomb v. Rice, 119 N. Y. 598; Harter v. Westcott, 155 N. Y. 211; Newton v. Russell, 87 N. Y. 527; Rose…
1Opinion of the CourtHiscock, J.
This action was brought for the purpose of restraining the board of education of the city of Rochester and various officials of that municipality from paying any bill or demand in favor of various of the defendants for services claimed to have been rendered in the school and institution of learning maintained and conducted at the city of Rochester by the appellant St. Mary’s Orphan Boys’ Asylum upon the ground in substance that said school was in whole or in part under the control or direction of a particular religious denomination and that denominational doctrines and tenets were taught…
2Cited by5 opinions
- City of Utica v. HannaNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Eisen v. PostNew York Supreme Court · 1958
- Carroll v. KeninAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966
- Huster v. NotarantonioNew York Supreme Court · 1930
- Smith v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1932