Roth v. Meyer
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs and motion denied. Memorandum: In support of his motion for a discretionary change of venue, defendant failed to set forth the complete addresses of prospective witnesses and their occupations and to describe the testimony he expected each of those witnesses to provide (see, Zinker v Zinker, 185 AD2d 698; see also, Abbadonza v Brown, 186 AD2d 1011). Thus, it was an improvident exercise of discretion for Supreme Court to grant the motion (see, O’Brien v Vassar Bros. Hosp., 207 AD2d 169, 171-172; see also, Pillittere v Ted & Ann Tours, 244…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- O'Brien v. Vassar Bros. HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Zinker v. ZinkerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Pillittere v. Ted & Ann Tours, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Abbadonza v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
3Cited by3 opinions
- Davis v. FirmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Cintas Corp. v. Pontiac-HondaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Rowland v. SlaytonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019