Legal Opinion

Crusto v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers

District Court, E.D. Louisiana

Decided July 7, 1981No. Civ. A. 78-4122PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ARCENEAUX, District Judge.

Plaintiffs instituted this action on December 15, 1978, against the Amalgamated Insurance Fund (“Fund”) and Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America (“Union”), under the Labor Management Relations Act (“LMRA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 186, et seq. As the basis for their cause of action against the Fund, the plaintiffs assert that: (1) the Fund arbitrarily and capriciously, and in bad faith, imposed on Mrs. Crusto the requirements of a retirement plan which relies on the Social Security Administration’s (“SSA”) findings of disability, instead of the plan in effect when the…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Board of Regents of Univ. of State of NY v. TomanioSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Ford Motor Co. v. HuffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  4. Rosa M. Figueroa De Arroyo v. Sindicato De Trabajadores Packinghouse, Afl-Cio, and Puerto Rico Telephone CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1970
  5. James Smith v. Local No. 25, Sheet Metal Workers International AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Allstate Fabricators Corp. v. Flagstaff Foodservice Corp. (In Re Flagstaff Foodservice Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API