Legal Opinion

United States v. Valles-Santana

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided November 18, 1976No. CM 433544PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*1050DECISION ON FURTHER REVIEW

DeFORD, Judge:

The appellant, contrary to his pleas, was convicted by a military judge sitting as a general court-martial of possession and sale of lysergic acid diethylamide on three occasions in violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice (10 U.S.C. § 934) and received the approved sentence set forth above.

In our initial review of this case, we affirmed the findings of guilty and the approved sentence set forth above. However, on 4 March 1976, the United States Court of Military Appeals vacated our decision and remanded the record of trial to this…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Schlesinger v. CouncilmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. O'Callahan v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Relford v. Commandant, US Disciplinary Barracks, Fort LeavenworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. United States v. McCarthyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
  5. United States v. BeekerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. EarhartU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1982
  2. United States v. BeckmanU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1978
  3. United States v. MackeyU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1979
  4. United States v. StokesU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1978
  5. United States v. KlineU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API