Herring v. Watson
Indiana Supreme Court
Prom Hendricks Circuit Court; James L. Clark, Judge. Action by Virgil S. Watson against Sarah. A. Herring and others. Prom a judgment for plaintiff, the defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtSpencer, J.
Appellee brought this action to resist the probate of the alleged will of Amanda J. Watson, deceased, for the reasons: (1) that at the time of the attempted execution of said will the testatrix was of unsound mind, and (2) that said will was unduly executed. The cause was tried by a jury which returned a verdict in favor of appellee and from a judgment on such verdict this appeal is prosecuted. The only error assigned is that the court erred in overruling appellants’ motion for a new trial and under this assignment appellants challenge certain instructions which were given to the jury.
*376 1.
2
3
*375Ins…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- De Hart v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
- Steinkuehler v. WempnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
- Reed v. WatsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1867
- Turner v. CookIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
- Hilker v. KelleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Larsen v. BjerkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
- In Re Estate of HoldenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
- Hough v. MillerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1942
- Kirmse v. Chicago, Terre Haute & Southeastern Railway Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1920
- McCord v. StraderIndiana Supreme Court · 1949
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.