Legal Opinion

Koelble, Admr. v. Runyan

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 14, 1927PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Matice:, J.

George A. Runyan brought an action against Koelble, as administrator of the estate of Henry Runyan, deceased, to recover on a promissory note made and delivered by the decedent to that plaintiff. The petition shows that the principal of said note was $10,000, subject to a credit of $1,504; that the payee had presented his claim to the administrator, who had allowed it in the sum of $8,496. Thereafter Mabel Runyan, one of the heirs of the decedent, filed in the probate court her written requisition for the rejection of the claim, and said claim was thereupon and thereby rejected.…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Crane v. CheekOhio Court of Appeals · 1970
  2. In Re Estate of AllisonOhio Court of Appeals · 1965
  3. United States v. George Williams, Jr., United States of America v. Rosa L. Sumpter, (Two Cases). United States of America v. Lussia Rein, United States of America v. James A. Lincoln, United States of America v. Mary L. Lincoln, United States of America v. Michele E. Lincoln, United States of America v. Albert Lincoln, United States of America v. Norris Dubose, United States of America v. Thelma DuboseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API