Legal Opinion
Rigney v. CSX Transportation, Inc.
District Court, M.D. Tennessee
Decided March 6, 2024No. 3:22-cv-00342Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION MATTHEW RIGNEY, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) No. 3:22-cv-00342 ) CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC., ) ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION Pending before the Court is Defendant CSX Transportation, Inc.’s (“CSXT”) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(B)(6) (Doc. No. 66). The motion has been fully briefed, (Doc. Nos. 67, 69, 79), and is now ripe for review. For the following reasons, the Court will deny CSXT’s motion (Doc. No. 66). ALLEGED FACTS AND BACKGROUND The Court…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Directv, Inc. And Echostar Satellite L.L.C. v. Mark Treesh, Commissioner for the Department of Revenue for the State of KentuckyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- CSX Transportation, Inc. v. EasterwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Eidson v. Tennessee Department of Children's ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Wisconsin Public Intervenor v. MortierSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.